Saturday, 5 February 2011

Pictures from the Hubble Telescope

Carina Nebula
Don't feel bad if your digital camera can't quite capture this type of imagery. This photo of the central region of Carina Nebula is a mosaic of 48 frames taken during March and July 2005 with Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys and Cerro-Tololo Interamieracn Observatory's Blanco Telescope and MOSAIC2 camera. What you see is an artist's impression of a giant planet passing in front of its parent star, also known as a transit.


Aquarius
See that little white dot at the center of the image? That's a White Dwarf Star, also known as a dead star, that is 650 light-years away and, apparently, refusing to burn out peacefully. The colorful gaseous material was once part of the star. The image is a composite from Hubble (visible data) and the Spitzer Space Telescope (infrared data).


Bug Nebula
This ethereal image, taken in 2004, shows us the Bug Nebula's dusty surroundings near the heart of the brighter inner nebula in the upper right. A star, hidden by dust, exists in the inner nebula but has never been seen. But we know it's there and it generates a not-so-comfortable temperature of at least 250,000 degrees C.



Eskimo Nebula
The Hubble captures this luminous view of a planetary nebula. It was nicknamed the Eskimo Nebula because when seen through a ground-based telescope it resembled a fur parka hood surrounding a face. The 'parka' is actually a ring of comet-shaped objects streaming away from the dying star at its center.


Sombrero
M 104, the Sombrero Galaxy, is a bright white core surrounded by round thin spiral arms. This galaxy is 50,000 light-years across and a mere 28 million light-years from where you're sitting right now. By the way, light travels at the grandmotherly pace of 186,000 miles per second.


Hubble Telescope: Tendrils
What's taking place here is a gathering of thick clumps and tendrils of interstellar hydrogen that are in the process of forming stars. Bet you never thought a planet could be made of gas. In fact, hydrogen is the primary component of Jupiter, the largest planet in the Solar System.


Van Gogh
In what has been described as "space phenomenon imitates art", variable star V838 Monocerotis is surrounded by walls of swirling interstellar dust. The Hubble image has been compared to "Starry Night", the painting by Dutch post-impressionist Vincent van Gogh. A variable star changes in brightness over time. V838 is 20,000 light years away.


Mutual Funds: Are they allowed?



In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

In the name of Allah, Most Compassionate, Most Merciful,

A mutual fund is simply a financial intermediary that allows a group of investors to pool their money together with a predetermined investment objective.  The mutual fund will have a fund manager who is responsible for investing the pooled money into specific securities (usually stocks or bonds).  When you invest in a mutual fund, you are buying shares (or portions) of the mutual fund and become a shareholder of the fund. 

Mutual funds are one of the best investments ever created because they are very cost efficient and very easy to invest in (you don't have to figure out which stocks or bonds to buy).

By pooling money together in a mutual fund, investors can purchase stocks or bonds with much lower trading costs than if they tried to do it on their own.  But the biggest advantage to mutual funds is diversification.
Diversification is the idea of spreading out your money across many different types of investments.  When one investment is down another might be up.  Choosing to diversify your investment holdings reduces your risk tremendously.

The most basic level of diversification is to buy multiple stocks rather than just one stock.  Mutual funds are set up to buy many stocks (even hundreds or thousands).  Beyond that, you can diversify even more by purchasing different kinds of stocks, then adding bonds, then international, and so on.  It could take you weeks to buy all these investments, but if you purchased a few mutual funds you could be done in a few hours because mutual funds automatically diversify in a predetermined category of investments (i.e. - growth companies, low-grade corporate bonds, international small companies).


The ruling with regards to mutual funds from an Islamic perspective can be determined by understanding the Shar�i ruling on shares and bonds.

The ruling with regards to investing in shares is that this is permissible (according to the majority of contemporary scholars), provided the following conditions are met:

1)     The main business of the company must be lawful (halal). Therefore, to purchase shares of a company whose main business is unlawful, such as interest bearing banks, insurance companies, companies manufacturing and selling liquor, etc will not be permitted.

If the main business of the company is Halal, such as a textile company or a telecommunication company, then it will be permissible to subscribe to its shares.

2)     Many companies, despite their main business being Halal may be involved in interest dealings in one way or another. Due to this, the following is necessary:

 a)     One should object to the interest dealings, preferably in the annual AGM. By doing so, the responsibility will be deemed fulfilled.
b)     When the dividend is distributed, the proportion of the company�s income which was gained by interest dealings must be given in charity without the intention of receiving reward, as is the case with unlawful money in general. This amount (interest accumulation) may be known by means of the income statement.

3)     The company whose shares one intends to purchase must have some illiquid assets in its possession. It must not all be in liquid form (i.e. cash, cheques, bonds, etc�). If all of the company�s assets are in liquid form, then the share cannot be sold or purchased except at face value.

With regards to bonds, the ruling is that, it is not permissible to invest in them. Premium bonds do not represent the ownership of the holder in a company or a financial institution; rather it only signifies giving a loan to the issuers of these bonds.

Due to this fact, the excess amount received on these bonds, which is stipulated and sought from the contract, is regarded as usury (riba), and is thus unlawful (haram).

Now, if investing in a mutual fund is regarded as purchasing the shares of the fund and becoming a share holder, then the ruling is that this is not permissible. The reason being, that one of the conditions for the permissibility of purchasing shares was that the company has some illiquid assets (see condition, 3), and the fund here is a combination of peoples investments.

If the case is that the fund is merely acting as an intermediary for the investment in shares and bonds, then this would also be impermissible. The reason being, that one is unaware what kind of companies the fund will invest into. Also, the funds normally invest in bonds, which have been declared unlawful.

And Allah knows best

Muhammad ibn Adam, UK

SOURCE

Trading in currencies

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

In the name of Allah, Most Compassionate, Most Merciful,
Scholars of the past considered paper currency to be representing gold and silver, hence they did not regard it to be something that had a value in of itself. Paper money was merely thought to be a certificate indicating that its holder owns gold and silver to the value of the note.

When one gave another a paper note, he was not giving any money that had a value in of itself, rather one was merely delivering a certificate that enabled the receiver to recover its amount in gold or silver.
Therefore, they stated that if Zakat was given in paper currency, one�s Zakat was not fulfilled, for one has not given any money to the poor. One�s Zakat will only be fulfilled when the recipient gets hold of gold or silver which the paper currency represents, or when one purchases an item with the money. Similarly, they stated that purchasing gold or silver with paper currency is not permissible, because it is like exchanging gold for gold, and the condition in exchanging gold with gold or silver is that both parties must take possession of the things exchanged in the same session, whereas here, the one taking the paper note is not physically taking possession of gold or silver. He is only receiving a certificate on the back of which there is gold or silver.

The Sound Position

However, most contemporary scholars such as Shaykh Taqi Usmani and others declared that paper currency has now become a medium of transaction in of itself; hence it is considered to be in place of gold and silver.
They state that the promise to pay gold and silver which appears on these paper notes is now meaningless and of no significance. The notes cannot be converted into gold, and they are accepted as money throughout the world. One cannot legally demand the one paying in notes that he must pay in gold or silver.
Paper currency no longer represents gold or silver, because in reality there is no guarantee of gold being on the back of every note. It is considered to be a legal tender and has now become a medium of transactions in of itself; hence it has taken the place of gold and silver.

Based on this, they state, the obligation of Zakat will be fulfilled by giving paper currency to the poor and needy. Also, one will be permitted to purchase gold and silver with these notes.
Moreover, Shaykh Taqi Usmani is of the view that paper currency is not to be treated as gold and silver, rather it is a separate unlimited legal tender. It would fall into the category of what the early Muslims called Fulus. (See: Buhuth fi Qadhaya Fiqhiyya Mu�asira, p. 147-161)

Trading in currency

Based on the above brief explanation, trading in currencies of the same country with excess on one side, like exchanging one pound for two pounds is unlawful, for that constitutes Riba. However, it would not be necessary that both parties take possession of money exchanged in the same session, as is the case with exchanging gold for gold. The reason being is that paper currency is not treated like gold and silver, rather it is legal tender and medium of exchange in of itself. However, one party must take possession in the session (majlis) of transaction, because departing (iftiraq) one another with debts on both sides is not permitted.
If the currency was exchanged at par value, such as exchanging one pound for one pound, then this is without doubt permissible.


As far as exchanging the currencies of different countries is concerned, this is permissible even with excess on one side, such as exchanging one pound for two dollars. The reason being is that the genus (jins) of both currencies is different, and when exchanging items of varied nature, it is permitted to have excess on one side.
Therefore, it is permitted to trade in currencies of different countries and to make profit from such trade. However, it would be necessary that one party takes possession of his currency at the time of transaction, for departing with debt on both sides is not permitted according to the Hadith.

Note that this permissibility is in normal circumstances, but scholars mention that trading in currencies at a rate that is against the rate determined by the government will not be permitted, although it can not be considered Riba.

This is based on the ruling that one must obey the law of the land in things that are not contrary to Shariah. Thus, if the government fixes a rate of exchanging pounds for dollars, then it will be sinful from an Islamic perspective also to trade in the black market at a different rate. However, one will not receive the sin of being involved in Riba.

And Allah knows best

Muhammad ibn Adam al-Kawthari

Source

More IDs captured from Mubaraks thugs


Egypt in Crisis : Improvised Headgear





Rabbi reports growing upsurge of Jewish support for Egyptian uprising

Rabbi reports growing upsurge of Jewish support for Egyptian uprising

No 112 Posted by fw, February 3, 2011

Ever since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.” Rabbi Michael Lerner

The above passage is from the opening paragraph of Rabbi Lerner’s article, Jewish prayers for Egyptian uprising, which appeared in Tikkun Magazine, of which Lerner is the editor.

It appears the tide is turning on many fronts. In one sense, the ranks of citizen activists is exploding. Here is the rest of Rabbi Lerner’s pivotal article with minor revisions and added subheadings to speed browsing. 

Jewish prayers for Egypt’s uprising by Rabbi Michael Lerner
“What is good for the world is good for the Jews”

Rabbi Michael Lerner

Ever since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.  
True, right-wing Jews who control the major Jewish organizations in the US (which operate on the principle of one dollar one vote, not one person one vote) and the right wing government of Israel have confined their reactions to “Is it good for the Jew?”, many other Jews react differently–realizing that it is good for the world, and so respond to a fundamental point made by Tikkun: what is good for the world is good for the Jews. 

“Majority of Jews are more excited and hopeful than worried”

Though a small segment of Jews have responded to right-wing voices from Israel that lament the change and fear that a democratic government would bring to power fundamentalist extremists who wish to destroy Israel and who would abrogate the hard-earned treaty that has kept the peace between Egypt and Israel for the last 30 years, the majority of Jews are more excited and hopeful than worried.
Jews must not be perceived as supporting the oppressive regime of the past

Of course, the worriers have a point. Israel has allied itself with repressive regimes in Egypt and used that alliance to ensure that the borders with Gaza would remain closed while Israel attempted to economically deprive the Hamas regime there by denying needed food supplies and equipment to rebuild after Israel’s devastating attack in December 2008 and January 2009. If the Egyptian people take over, they are far more likely to side with Hamas than with the Israeli blockade of Gaza. But the fundamentalists in Egypt are Sunni, unlike the Shi’ite fundamentalists in Iran, and many have publicly stated that they would not want war with Israel nor do they seek to impose Sharia law in the way it is imposed in Afghanistan or Iran, but rather they would accept a mixed society. Unlike the Shi’ites, the Sunni do not believe as a matter of doctrine that the society must be ruled by clergy. Of course, within the ranks of fundamentalists there will be an inevitable struggle between those who are more anti-Israel and anti-West and those who are more open to Israel and the West. At the current moment the Muslim Brotherhood is led by the more moderate elements. Will these moderates win out?  

Well what we do during the transition, both as Americans and as Jews, and what Israel does,  could have an impact on the outcome. If we are perceived as continuing to support the oppressive regime of the past that will tend to help the most reactionary elements, and if we are perceived as trying to help the Egyptian people achieve genuine freedom and democracy, that is likely to help the most moderate elements.

Right-wing Jews do not understand that “our well being depends on the well being of everyone”

It is impossible for most Jews to forget our heritage as victims of another Egyptian tyrant – the Pharaoh whose reliance on brute force was overthrown when the Israelite slaves managed to escape from Egypt some 3,000 years ago. That story of freedom retold each year at our Passover “Seder” celebration, and read in synagogues in the past month, has often predisposed the majority of Jews to side with those struggling for freedom around the world (except for the most right-wing Jews who have placed Jewish survival as their sole concern and do not understand that our well being depends on the well being of everyone else on the planet, because we are all one).

The yearning for freedom cannot be stamped out

To watch hundreds of thousands of Egyptians able to throw off the chains of oppression and the legacy of a totalitarian regime that consistently jailed, tortured or murdered its opponents so overtly that most people were cowed into silence, is to remember that the spark of God continues to flourish no matter how long oppressive regimes manage to keep themselves in power, and that ultimately the yearning for freedom and democracy cannot be totally stamped out no matter how cruel and sophisticated the elites of wealth, power and military might appear to be.

Jews are warning Israel and the US that their security cannot be secured through military or economic domination but through generosity and caring

Many Jews have warned Israel that it is a mistake to ally with these kinds of regimes, just as we’ve warned the US to learn the lesson from its failed alliance with the Shah of Iran. We’ve urged Israel to free the Palestinian people by ending the Occupation of the West Bank and the blockade of Gaza. Israel’s long-term security will not be secured through military or economic domination, but only by acting in a generous and caring way toward the Palestinian people first, and then toward all of  its Arab neighbours.
Similarly, America’s homeland security will best be achieved through a strategy of generosity and caring, manifested through a new Global Marshall Plan such as has been introduced into the House of Representatives by Congressman Keith Ellison.

Stunning uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt may allow for a new kind of thinking to emerge in the West
In normal times, when the forces of repression seem to be winning, this kind of thinking is dismissed as “utopian” by the “realists” who shape public political discourse. But when events like the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt occur, for a moment the politicians and media are stunned enough to allow a different kind of thinking to emerge, the kind of thinking that acknowledged that underneath all the “business as usual” behaviour of the world’s peoples, the yearning for a world based on solidarity, caring for each other, freedom, self-determination, justice, non-violence and yes, even love and generosity, remains a potent and unquenchable thirst that may be temporarily repressed but never fully extinguished.

It is this recognition that leads many Jews to join with the rest of the world’s peoples in celebrating the uprising, in praying that it does not become manipulated by the old regime into paths that too quickly divert the hopes for a brand new kind of order into politics and economics as usual, or into extremist attempts to switch the anger from domestic elites who have been the source of Egyptian oppression onto Jews or Israel which have not been responsible for the suffering of the Egyptian people.

Unlike Obama, Jews are not waffling in their support for the Egyptians

We hope that Egyptians will hear the news that they have strong support from many in the Jewish world. We are not waffling like Obama – we want the overthrow of Mubarak, the freeing of all political prisoners, the redistribution of wealth in a fair way, trials for those who perpetrated torture and other forms of injustice, and the democratisation of all aspects of Egyptian life.

Source - http://citizenactionmonitor.wordpress.com/

Friday, 4 February 2011

Investing in the Stock Market

In the name of Allah, Most Compassionate, Most Merciful,

To invest in the share of a particular company or to purchase shares a company’s from the stock market has been a matter of debate between the contemporary scholars.

Some contemporary scholars (who are very few) are of the opinion that it is not permissible to invest in shares. There basic argument is that, shares do not represent an ownership for the share-holder in the company’s assets, rather the share certificate is a document that signifies lending of some amount of cash to a particular company. The dividend which one receives will be considered interest (riba), thus unlawful.

The majority of the scholars, however, do not agree with this opinion. Scholars such as, Shaykh Ali al-Khafif, Dr. Wahba al-Zuhaili, Shaykh Taqi Usmani and others have declared investing in the shares of companies lawful (halal) subject to certain conditions.

They say that the share certificate actually signifies an ownership in a company for the share-holder. His ownership is in proportion of his investment in the company. This is the reason why if the company was to become bankrupt, the share-holder will not regain his investment in the state of cash, rather he will receive the company’s assets according to his proportionate ownership.

Therefore, it will be permissible to invest in the shares of companies, and the share certificate will not imply lending cash to the company.
If one intends to purchase shares from the stock market, it will be permissible with adherence to the following conditions:
1) The main business of the company must be lawful (halal). Therefore, to purchase shares of a company whose main business is unlawful, such as interest bearing banks, insurance companies, companies manufacturing and selling liquor, etc... would not be permitted.
If the main business of the company is Halal, such as a textile company or a telecommunication company, then it will be permissible to subscribe to its shares.
2) Many companies, despite their main business being Halal may be involved in interest dealings in one way or another. Due to this the following is necessary:
a) One should object to the interest dealings, preferably in the annual AGM. By doing so, the responsibility will be deemed fulfilled.
b) When the dividend is distributed, the proportion of the company’s income which was gained by interest dealings must be given in charity without the intention of receiving reward, as is the case with unlawful money in general. This amount (interest accumulation) may be known by means of the income statement.

3) The company whose shares one intends to purchase must have some illiquid assets in its possession. They must not all be in liquid form (i.e. cash, cheques, bonds, etc…). If all of the company’s assets are in liquid form, then the share cannot be sold or purchased except at face value.

The reason for this is that the share in this case represents money only, and money cannot be traded in except at par.

If the above three/four conditions are complied, then it will be permissible to trade in shares from the stock market.

As far as working as a stock broker is concerned, the work normally consists of buying and selling shares on behalf of a client. In the light of the above, it becomes clear that those shares in which it is permissible to trade, his work will also be permissible, and vice versa.

Therefore, it would be better not to work as a stock broker. However, if one is able to save oneself being involved in unlawful trading then it will be permissible.

And Allah knows best

Muhammad ibn Adam, UK

SOURCE

Christians guarding praying muslims in egypt

Demonstrators detain policemen/ govt-hired thugs



As the man was dragged kicking and screaming to one of Tahrir Square’s makeshift prisons, cries of “kill him!” filled the air.

Some anti-government protesters tried to protect the man, who was taken underground to be kept in Sadat Station.

His captors said he was a policeman--one of at least 120 suspected security officials and criminals captured by demonstrators as of this afternoon.

According to Ahmed Naguib, who has been coordinating the media on behalf of the protesters, most of them were handed over to the military after being kept in temporary jails. He said: “We caught people on death row, people who have escaped from prison as well as thugs and policeman.”

Throughout last night, mobs of demonstrators could be seen dragging suspected criminals or police through Tahrir Square to the Sadat Station prison. Occasionally the suspects would be beaten, but some demonstrators tried to protect their captives.

Naguib said: “It’s extremely hard to protect them if they are dragged through the square. People here have been shot at and are very angry.”

Many suspect that plainclothes police have been behind much of the violence since pro-Mubarak factions swept through Tahrir Square yesterday.

Near the square’s Al-Tahrir Street entrance, a small collection of police and security officials’ confiscated IDs were on display. There was also a collection of weapons reportedly seized from the captives, including petrol bombs, a knuckle-duster and a 2ft-long sword.

According to Naguib, one of the people being held today included a major in the state security apparatus. He said activists were unwilling to release him because he was considered such a danger.

Ahmed Wahba, a 41-year-old demonstrator who saw some of the prisoners being caught, said: “The Mubarak regime is stupid. Look how peaceful everyone is being here. They are asking for basic human rights, equality and social justice, but Mubarak is trying to organize violence.”

SOURCE

Thursday, 3 February 2011

What next for Egypt?


Mubarak Thug's ID, Captured by Protesters

As morning breaks in Egypt Mubarak-hired thugs are attacking protesters with gunfire, many dead already. Fears are there will be a massacre all morning. The proof is here that the "pro-Mubarak" demonstrators "clashing" with anti-Mubarak freedom fighters are all security forces out of uniform and criminals let of out jail and paid to attack peaceful people.

This was Tweeted from Tahrir Square today, a security forces ID captured from a plainclothes thug who the protesters caught. We can use it to remind the world with one image that the "chaos" is actually a brutal attack by Mubarak. Let's make this goon famous. Post it everywhere.

Buttresses Nicholas Kristoff's vital report.

Translation of ID reads: "- The Arab republic of Egypt The Interior Ministry Police Number 2003/1/3//2003/0007503 Department General Sub-division/22 Name Kareem Ahmed Al-Sayed Ahmed Card Number (blurred, maybe 1501120) civil file m/al-qanater al-khayria/ (unclear) expiry date 2012/03/01 Below picture: director of general directory of (unclear) (signature) Lewa (police rank) Mr Mohammed Saleh"

Subject is an officer.

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

Egyptian women protesting in the current civil unrest

Leil-Zahra Morada has been collecting images of Egyptian women in the current demonstrations. The rest of the album can be seen here









Mubarak’s new deputy linked to CIA rendition program

By Agence France-Presse
Monday, January 31st, 2011 -- 9:20 pm

omarsuleimanafp Mubaraks new deputy linked to CIA rendition program



WASHINGTON — The man named by President Hosni Mubarak as his first ever deputy, Egyptian spy chief Omar Suleiman, reportedly orchestrated the brutal interrogation of terror suspects abducted by the CIA in a secret program condemned by rights groups.

His role in the controversial "war on terror" illustrates the ties that bind the United States and the Egyptian regime, as an unprecedented wave of protests against Mubarak's rule presents Washington with a difficult dilemma.

With Mubarak in jeopardy, Suleiman was anointed vice president last week and is now offering wide ranging talks with the opposition in a bid to defuse the crisis.

Suleiman is a sophisticated operator who carried out sensitive truce negotiations with Israel and the Palestinians as well as talks among rival Palestinian factions, winning the praise of American diplomats.
For US intelligence officials, he has been a trusted partner willing to go after Islamist militants without hesitation, targeting homegrown radical groups Gamaa Islamiya and Jihad after they carried out a string of attacks on foreigners.A product of the US-Egyptian relationship, Suleiman underwent training in the 1980s at the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare School and Center at Fort Bragg in North Carolina.

As spy chief, Suleiman reportedly embraced the CIA's controversial "extraordinary rendition" program, in which terror suspects snatched by the Americans were taken to Egypt and other countries without legal proceedings and subjected to interrogations.

He "was the CIA's point man in Egypt for rendition," Jane Mayer, author of "The Dark Side," wrote on the New Yorker's website.

After taking over as spy director, Suleiman oversaw an agreement with the United States in 1995 that allowed for suspected militants to be secretly transferred to Egypt for questioning, according to the book "Ghost Plane" by journalist Stephen Grey.

Human rights groups charge the detainees have often faced torture and mistreatment in Egypt and elsewhere, accusing the US government of violating its own legal obligations by handing over suspects to regimes known for abuse.

In the run-up to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, the CIA relied on Suleiman to accept the transfer of a detainee known as Ibn Sheikh al-Libi, who US officials hoped could prove a link between Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda.

The suspect was bound and blindfolded and flown to Cairo, where the CIA believed their longtime ally Suleiman would ensure a successful interrogation, according to "The One Percent Doctrine" by author Ron Suskind.
A US Senate report in 2006 describes how the detainee was locked in a cage for hours and beaten, with Egyptian authorities pushing him to confirm alleged connections between Al-Qaeda and Saddam.
Libi eventually told his interrogators that the then Iraqi regime was moving to provide Al-Qaeda with biological and chemical weapons.

When the then US secretary of state Colin Powell made the case for war before the United Nations, he referred to details of Libi's confession.

The detainee eventually recanted his account.

Source: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/mubarak-deputy-cia-rendition/

Fox News Map of the Middle East

Fox news map of the middle east!

(Published  July 27 2009, Fox News' The Live Desk)


Hard Cash

Nasreddin Hodja owed some money to a neighbour. The neighbour had asked for his money numerous times to no avail. One day he was at the Hodja's door again.
`Hodja Effendi, when are you going to pay my money back?'
`Look!' Nasreddin Hodja pointed out to a spot in his garden, `I planted shrubs over there.'
`So?'
`They will grow this tall by spring.'
`And?'
`All the sheep that pass by will brush against the shrubs and their wool will get caught by the prickly bushes.'
`Yes?'
`Then we will collect the wool from the shrubs and my daughter will spin them into yarns. I will take those yarns to the bazaar and sell them. With the money I get, I will pay you back.'
At this remote and unlikely solution, the neighbour had nothing to do but laugh.
`You see,' the Hodja said when he saw the lender laughing, `your mood improved when you saw the cash on the nail.'

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

Deferred Dreams, Self-Destruction, and Suicide Bombings - Sh Hamza Yusuf

 
There was a story in the New York Times a few days ago about how the "revolution" in Tunisia was sparked in December by the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi, a 26-year-old, befuddled roadside green grocer. Like so many young Arabs, he was born poor and only dreamed of providing for his siblings and his mother. He had been to college, where he studied law, but had found no employment possibilities. So, given the basic dignity often found in people in places like Tunisia, he chose to humble himself and find a halal means to generate some income. But he kept running into problems with the police and government inspectors until the fateful day in December when they confiscated his cart and his produce, saying he didn’t have a proper permit, and leaving him with an unpaid loan with which he’d bought the goods. At the station, upon attempting to reclaim his cart, he was slapped and humiliated publicly. His already deferred dreams had clearly dried up. Bouazizi left an apologetic note for his mother and set himself on fire in front of the local government building.
 
Four weeks later, the protests sparked by his death brought down the government of President Zine el Abdidine Ben Ali, who’d ruled Tunis with an iron hand for 23 years.
 
I have had the good fortune of visiting Tunisia many times. During my last visit, which was in the early nineties, I was harassed by the Mukhabarat (secret police), and the family that I was staying with was also questioned. That left a bad taste for me, and I decided not to return to the country and have not been back since.
 
Mukhabarat notwithstanding, my experience of the Tunisians is that they are wonderful people. They are known among Arabs for being kind and gentle. They are slow to lose their temper and quick to lend a hand to a stranger. I remember seeing young men selling beautiful bundles of jasmine flowers that had such a powerful scent that you could smell a seller coming your way long before he reached you.
 
Tunisia is a stunningly beautiful country with a great history and a bright and talented people, but corruption, cruelty, and the ineptitude of leaders unable to gauge the frustration of their people has led to the current crisis. Like so many Muslim countries, its government has been run largely by a family operation with a tribal mentality that was milking a population dry.
 
When the government was brought down this month, President Ben Ali fled with his wife, Leila, to Jeddah of all places; terrible floods in the port city inauspiciously welcomed him. It seems that Jeddah is the choice retirement haven of ex-African Muslim tyrants, including the former dictator Idi Amin of Uganda. Sometimes, birds of prey flock together in unlikely places. No doubt, Ben Ali has millions, if not billions, of dollars in his Swiss accounts, but even Europe, despite its dire need of cash, didn’t want him. Options diminish quickly for these men once they’re out of political power, but where odiousness closes doors in some places, great wealth obviously opens them in others.
 
The irony is that such tyrants usually rise to power because the people want to get rid of tyranny from a previous source. Years ago, I was in the house of the great Tunisian scholar, Shaykh Shadhili Nayfar, who was from a proud Andalusian family that had fled to Tunis with the collapse of Muslim Spain. Shaykh Shadhili had been the dean at al-Zaytuna University, one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in the world. He studied rare manuscripts and had a great library in his home that researchers could use. Since he was a former Member of Parliament in Tunisia, I asked him about the country’s history. He told me that during the anti-colonial movement to rid the country of the French, the scholars of al-Zaytuna University were very powerful indeed, but the single most unifying force was around the politician, Habib Bourguiba, and the scholars of al-Zaytuna debated long and hard whether or not to back Bourguiba, as he was an avowed secularist and had no commitment to the religion.
 
Shaykh Shadhili said that the scholars opted to support Bourguiba because they thought he would help the Tunisians oust the French, and they could deal with him thereafter. However, little did these scholars realize that Bourguiba would be worse than the French and would, in fact, turn against them before they could do anything about him. This seems to be the great lesson of revolutions and coups: With rare exceptions, they bring in new governments that are as bad or worse than the ones they ousted. The man who just fled from Tunisia to Jeddah had taken the government from a decrepit and delirious Bourguiba promising the Tunisians that the age of tyranny was over. Hah.
 
An intriguing aspect of the current Tunisian situation is the absence of ideology. This is a genuine uprising of people who are sick and tired of the corruption and cruelty of a state apparatus. Monarchs of old practiced the tradition of benevolence. They were not always benevolent but were raised with the understanding that they were there to serve the people. These pathetic Arab rulers who overthrew those monarchs practice the worst types of cronyism and nepotism, placing their sons on their "thrones," and they thrive in an environment that is driven by family and tribal allegiance. The cracks have been showing for a while. And now, in Tunisia, it has all come tumbling down.
 
The lessons of history are worth heeding. Tunis, once called Carthage, had a mythical queen, Dido. According to legend, she killed herself on a funeral pyre due to her despair at being scorned by Aeneas, who abandoned her to Rome. The historical Hannibal led a Tunisian army to Rome to rid Tunis of Roman persecution, but he failed, and Rome’s vengeance led to the salting of the soil in Tunis and the destruction of Carthage that lies in ruins today near the capital. The Muslim world now has its share of misguided, petty Hannibals who think that by attacking Rome, they will restore the glory of "Carthage." Yet, their attacks only provide the necessary excuses for the Empire to salt the soil of Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
                      *****                                    *****                                    *****
 
While the Tunisian Dido didn’t accomplish anything through her suicide by fire, our poor green grocer, Mohamed Bouazizi, has ignited the Arab world in flames, achieving in death what he could not in life – sense of purpose and meaning – indubitably more than all the suicide bombers around the globe combined. His was an act of a desperate man who chose not to kill others but instead to light himself on fire in protest. This was the sacrificial tactic that Buddhist monks used during the Vietnam War, and their actions had a massive impact on the psyches of Westerners. When a situation becomes so desperate that people choose to leave the world rather than to stay in it and struggle, the message to the surviving ones is clear: it is time for a change. Well that change is happening in Egypt and other places in the Muslim world. Let’s hope for the best and pray for these poor, suffering people who deserve far better than their leaders have given them.
 
Suicide is rare in the Muslim world, but it’s increasing. God makes life generally bearable for people, so they will choose even highly difficult situations over the option of checking out. Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, which begins with "To be or not to be," reminds us that in taking our own lives, we may be fleeing to troubles far greater than the ones prompting us to flee.
 
An odd aspect of the reaction to Bouazizi’s suicidal act is that some Muslims will surely condemn it, since suicide is clearly prohibited in Islam, but these same Muslims will justify the actions of suicide bombers, now euphemistically called "martyrdom operations" ('amiliyyat istishhadiyyah) on Arabic newscasts. The justifiers point out that suicide bombing is an act of defense, and their only real weapon at that.
 
But the similarities and differences of a suicide and suicide bombing are worth contemplating. In Bouazizi’s mind, suicide was his only weapon of defense against an unjust Tunisian government that would neither listen to him nor even let him earn a livelihood selling vegetables without having to bribe some low-level official to get the piece of paper that would enable him to do so. A suicide bomber, as the social science studies show, is also in a similar state of despair, and straps bombs to himself so he can kill himself and other people about whom he knows nothing. The assumption the suicide bomber makes seems to be, "My life and my people’s lives are miserable, and no one is doing anything about it, so it might fix things if I sacrifice my life and take a bunch of other people’s lives too." Hence, some people just being on an Israeli street corner become a target, irrespective of whether they support or oppose Israeli aggression against Palestinians. What makes such suicide bombing more honorable than Bouazizi’s suicide?
 
Suicide is suicide, it seems to me, but it becomes truly heinous when one decides to take others with him using indiscriminate methods of mass destruction. I cannot sit in judgment of the Palestinians who have resorted to such measures nor the Chechnyian women who lost husbands and children and in acts of savage revenge killed themselves and others. I am not in their shoes, and I cannot fathom the depth of their despair. However, I do not condone the act of suicide bombing or any form of suicide, as I consider both to be of the same ilk, and in fact the former is worse in my estimation due to the extended harm to others. And I do judge the notion that suicide bombers are somehow not really committing suicide (because they are taking the lives of others) yet our Tunisian green grocer deserves to go to hell because he is committing suicide. He is not seen as a martyr, but the suicide bombers are viewed as noble martyrs because along with their own lives they took some possibly innocent bystanders; hence, in this view, suicide bombers deserve a martyr’s honor and paradise. I must admit, I just don’t get it; I think those who promote this notion need to study Mizan al-amal and the other great texts of ethical theory in our tradition.
 
Like copycat suicide bombers who now proliferate all over the Muslim world, we are seeing copycat self-immolators in places like Egypt, Algeria, and even Mauritania. Dr. T. J. Winter said, "Suicide bombing is an extreme way of shooting oneself in the foot." The Muslim world deserves better strategies for dealing with very real social issues as well as better leadership, clearly.
 
            *****                                                *****                                                *****
 
Though suicide is haram, the simple protest of this Tunisian street vendor did more to change the status quo and put real fear in the hearts of the tyrants than all of the suicide bombers. We must devise better and more civilized ways of dealing with our differences, as we live in an age of nuclear power, machine guns, aerial bombings, and global news cycles that expose us to the pain and suffering of peoples in far off places.
 
Many people in the West have no idea how much the Arab on the street suffers from humiliation under unjust rulers and their petty minions. I have a friend who is a beautiful young Arab man from the desert. Unlike some of his compatriots who come to the West and have promiscuous relationships, he chose to honorably marry an American Muslim woman while he was studying here. Now, upon returning to his homeland, he is struggling to get a visa for her, as his country does not like its citizens to marry outside their land without first notifying the government. He now simply waits for the whim of some petty bureaucrat to issue his wife a visa so that she can join her husband and meet his family.
 
Like our green grocer, people can only take so much.
 
The great American novelist, writer, and poet, Langston Hughes, wrote:
 
What happens to a dream deferred?

Does it dry up
Like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore…
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over…
like a syrupy sweet?

Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.

Or does it explode?
 
Our green grocer went to university with dreams; but his dreams did not materialize, and so he turned to selling vegetables to earn an honorable livelihood. Yet he was not allowed even to fulfill that pitiful deferred dream. They should have just let the man sell his vegetables, but they didn’t, and the fire was lit. Already those flames have spread to Egypt, and we watch with fear and trepidation, hoping and praying for our brothers and sisters in Egypt, the heart of the Arab world, which now is engulfed in the bonfire of revolution.
 
Post Script:
Sorry for the delay in posting a blog. If you knew why, you would sympathize. I really appreciate the prayers and well wishes so many of you expressed. Thank you and God bless you. Please pray for our brothers and sisters in Jeddah also who are suffering from devastating rainfalls that have left many homeless.

Distributing Grapes

One day the hodja was walking home with a basket of grapes in his arm. When the neighbourhood children saw the grapes, they asked for some. Hodja gave each one of them a small cluster of grapes. When the children complained that he was giving too little, Hodja had to come up with an excuse to save his basket of grapes from being consumed before he reached home.

`A little, a lot,' he said, `they all taste the same.'

Monday, 31 January 2011

Game Over…We Win?

The current uprising in Egypt, coming in the aftermath of the popular revolution in Tunisia, is a monumental event that is altering all of the political calculations currently governing how we think about Middle Eastern politics. The emerging popular movements in the region have led to a swift reshuffling of the mental furniture governing the way Tunisians, Egyptians, and likely other people in the region see themselves and their relationship to those who have been ruling them with repression, fear and intimidation. The new thinking shows that the people are no longer afraid of their rulers and their dreaded security apparatuses. Now that that reshuffling has occurred, as one of the most popular Tunisian protest posters declared, “Game Over.” No matter what happens in Egypt going forward, the old game is indeed over.

Middle Easterners are not the only ones whose mental furniture needs reshuffling. Here in the United States, we need to begin to critically assess our silence in the face of the atrocities we support, or knowingly turn a blind eye to. Our officials know that the money we have been pumping into the Mubarak regime for the past 30 years has done nothing to improve the lot of the average Egyptian. Rather, it was being used to strengthen the Egyptian military and the internal “security” forces, which is a euphemism for the forces of torture and political repression. For example, the State Department’s 2008 Human Rights Report for Egypt mentions:
Police and the SSIS reportedly employed torture methods such as stripping and blindfolding victims; suspending victims by the wrists and ankles in contorted positions or from a ceiling or door-frame with feet just touching the floor; beating victims with fists, whips, metal rods, or other objects; using electric shocks; dousing victims with cold water; and sexual abuse, including sodomy. Victims reported that security officials threatened them and forced them to sign statements for use against themselves or their families should they in the future lodge complaints about the torture. Some victims, including women and children, reported that security officials sexually assaulted or threatened to rape them or their family members. Human rights groups reported that the lack of legally required written police records often effectively blocked investigations.
What is mentioned in this report is the tip of the iceberg concerning the abuses that every Egyptian knows of. The dehumanizing horrors occurring in the “Zinzana” are not well-kept secrets. However, what did the United States do about these atrocities after documenting them? We did the same thing we did about the rigged elections that kept falsely affirming Mubarak and his gerontocracy in power. We did the same thing we did in the face of the grinding poverty of the country, only accentuated by the regime’s enthusiasm to accept neoliberal economic policies that only funneled money from the impoverished masses and into the clutches of the wealthy elite managing their society on behalf of their western sponsors. Namely, nothing. In the name of our war against terror, in the name of our security interests, in the name of our economic interests we did nothing.

It is time for Americans to acknowledge that when we prioritize our interests in foreign lands over the interests of the citizens of those lands in many instances those citizens are starved, politically disenfranchised, tortured and sometimes killed. We have to realize that this is not only true in the Middle East, it is just as true in the Congo, Haiti and elsewhere.

Tunisians and now Egyptians have bravely stood up and challenged the hypocrisy, brutality and illegitimacy of their rulers. It is blatant hypocrisy for America to pontificate about the need for peaceful political reform in the Middle East and then support the violent repression of peaceful reformers or circumvent internal reform all together by imposing political change through the barrel of an M1 Abrams tank. It is time that the people of this country stand up and challenge that hypocrisy. The masses in Tunisia and Egypt should be a source of courage and inspiration for us in this regard.

The popular movements emerging in the Middle East are giving birth to watershed events that may well redefine the political map of the region for the next century. We should work to make sure that the vision and hope they embody are not confined to the Middle East. Now is the time for us to express our solidarity with the people of Egypt and elsewhere as they struggle to carve out a dignified existence for themselves and their progeny. If we do so with courage, conviction, vision and principle we may all live to see a day when the old game will be over everywhere. If that happens, we will all be the winners

Juju's message to Mubarak

8 Year old Saudi girls' thoughts on President Mubarak of Egypt and the current protests.

FYI: The hotel reference is related to what she thought were the buildings on fire.

The oneness of Physical, Emotional, Social and Spiritual Health - Hakim Archuletta

Sunday, 30 January 2011

Egyptian Revolution (?)

Young childing standing up to Police Force


Human shield protecting Cairo Museum


Walk like an Egyptian!


Time running out for Mubarak

Prayer of the Oppressed


Farewell Mubarak

Natural Healing Learning from Tradition - Hakim Archuletta

Hakim Archuletta studied homeopathy and apprenticed with Dr. John Damonte in London in the early 70's. He continued these studies in Berkeley apprenticing with homeopathic doctors and working with the first Homeopathic Study group there. He continued his studies in the Middle East, England and North Africa and went to Pakistan at the invitation of Hakim Mohammad Said of the Hamdard Foundation and studied there with various Hakims, learning pharmacy in the Unani tradition. Returning to America in 1980, he began teaching students privately and established a family practice clinic. Today he lectures and conducts workshops throughout the world.



















4lch3m1st © 2008. Design by :Yanku Templates Religion Blogs Muslim Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory Religion Top Blogs TopOfBlogs The Alchemy of Happiness Religion Blogs